3/13/2024 0 Comments Exciting emacs text editor![]() is probably the most comprehensive, but the info is buried in there since it's on a tangent to the main subject. He (Steve Yegge) has elaborated on this, in bits in pieces, in other postings of his. Is there a measurable difference in skill, productivity, or programming enjoyment between people who depend on IDEs and those who don't, or is it all just fanboyism? It's hard to separate fact from fanboyism, so I'm not willing to take Yegge's comments at face value just yet. (Apparently there's an Emacs command for discovering other Emacs commands, which I couldn't find by the way - it's like living your own cruel Zen-like joke.) I tried to make myself like the program for a good month, but eventually decided that I'd rather have drag-and-drop GUI designers, IntelliSense, and interactive debugging instead. ![]() Since then, I've been more or less IDE dependent, having used Visual Studio, NetBeans, IntelliJ, Borland/Codegear Studio, and Eclipse for my entire career.įor what it's worth, I have tried Emacs, and my experience was a frustrating one because of its complete lack of out-of-the-box discoverable features. The last time I used a text editor for writing code was back when I was still writing HTML in Notepad about 1000 years ago.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |